A Creation and annihilation operator

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sebas4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Qft
Sebas4
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Does the annihilation/creation operator on the complex exponent?
Hey, I have a short question.
The quantized field in Schrödinger picture is given by:
\hat{\phi} \left(\textbf{x}\right) =\int \frac{d^{3}p}{\left(2\pi\right)^3} \frac{1}{\sqrt{\omega_{2\textbf{p}}}}\left(\hat{a}_{\textbf{p}}e^{i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}} + \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\textbf{p}}e^{-i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}}\right)

My question is, does the the annihilation \hat{a}_{\textbf{p}} and creation \hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\textbf{p}} operator act on e^{i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}} and e^{-i\textbf{p} \cdot \textbf{x}} respectively? In other words: does the annihilation/creation operator on the complex exponent?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sebas4 said:
does the the annihilation a^p and creation a^p† operator act on eip⋅x and e−ip⋅x respectively?

No.
 
Well, it does in the sense that ##a## and ##a^\dagger## commute with these factors.
 
No, they don't. The creation and annihilation operators are linear operators defined in the Fock space. The expeonential functions are numbers; ##\vec{x}, \vec{p} \in \mathbb{R}^3##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top