Creative destruction examples

AI Thread Summary
Creative destruction often occurs when new technologies disrupt established power structures, empowering the masses at the expense of elites. Notable examples include Napster, which revolutionized music sharing and challenged the music industry's control, and the printing press, which democratized information access and diminished the Church's authority. Television also significantly shifted power dynamics by providing widespread access to information, though its impact on information quality is debated. Overall, these technologies illustrate how innovation can undermine elite control and redistribute power among the general population.
SamRoss
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
36
Does anyone know of any creative destruction examples where a new technology undermined the power of a group of elites that seemed to be holding all the cards? Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
You might check out “The Innovator’s Dilemna”
 
printing press
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, SamRoss, berkeman and 1 other person
256bits said:
printing press
In terms of the amount of raw power it put in the hands of the masses only TV's done it better. The massive quantity of information is indisputable but the quality?
 

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

Applying Dalton's Law: From Popcorn Launchers to Innovative Products
Replies
4
Views
1K
Shutting Down Social Media to Prevent Destruction in Schools?
Replies
3
Views
1K
B What is Destructive Interference?
Replies
48
Views
4K
I Mechanism of Energy Conservation in Zero-Amplitude Sum of EM Waveforms
Replies
12
Views
693
What is Baseband RF communication?
Replies
5
Views
1K
The destructive force of a 1,000kg boulder hurled by a catapult
Replies
3
Views
2K
Difference in destructive power between a heavy stick and a light stick?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Can nuclear self destruct codes activate in silos?
Replies
40
Views
5K
Ethical Discussion -- Engineering used to create innovation versus destruction
Replies
13
Views
2K
Are There Sci-Fi Movies Similar to Oppenheimer?
Replies
15
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top