Damped linear oscillator: Energy losses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the total energy of a damped linear oscillator is a function of time and that its time derivative is negative. The equation of motion is given as m\ddot{x}+b\dot{x}+k{x}=0, where m is mass, b is the damping constant, and k is the spring constant. The participant derives that the total energy can be expressed as E=C-b∫{\dot{x}^2 dt}, indicating that energy decreases over time due to the damping effect. The negative time derivative of energy, dE/dt=-b\dot{x}^2, confirms that energy is lost as the system evolves. The conversation highlights the importance of formalizing these steps in the proof.
Rulonegger
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello everyone. I need to demonstrate that with a damped free oscillator, which is linear, the total energy is a function of the time, and that the time derivative of the total energy is negative, without saying if the motion is underdamped, critically damped or overdamped, i.e. in general.

Homework Equations


From the non-canonical equation for the free oscillator in one dimension m\ddot{x}+b\dot{x}+k{x}=0 where m is the mass attached to the spring (for example), b is a constant for the damping, and k is the spring constant.

The Attempt at a Solution


I could get the general solution for the equation stated above, but the expressions for the energy are a little cumbersome.
Another way I've been tried is that the equation for the motion of the oscillator times \dot{x} gives
m\dot{x}\ddot{x}+b(\dot{x})^2+k{x}\dot{x}=0
integrating over time gives
\frac{m\ddot{x}^2}{2}+b\int{\dot{x}^2 dt}+\frac{k x^2}{2}=C
but the former expression looks like the total energy of the simple harmonic oscillator, which is
\frac{m\ddot{x}^2}{2}+\frac{k x^2}{2}=E
so I'm tempted to say that the total energy for the damped oscillator is
E=C-b\int{\dot{x}^2 dt}
and say that if the velocity \dot{x} is not zero (b>0 as hypothesis), the expression for E depends explicitly on time, and that the time derivative of E is (using the fundamental theorem for integral calculus):
\frac{dE}{dt}=-b\dot{x}^2
which is negative, so energy decreases as time increases.
So far, i think everything is correct, but i need to formalize the above steps, first on the fact that E=C-b\int{\dot{x}^2 dt}, which was the crucial point of the proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything looks fine to me (except I'm sure you meant to write the kinetic energy as ##\frac{m\dot{x}^2}{2}##).

Note that your result for dE/dt makes a lot of sense. The damping force is ##f = -b\dot{x}## and the rate at which that force does work is ##f\dot{x} = -b\dot{x}^2##.
 
Thank's TSny, and yeah I've made a copy-paste error. I'm very grateful for your help!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top