DE: Critical Damping Oscillating?

Click For Summary
Critical damping is designed to return a system to equilibrium without oscillation, characterized by repeated roots in the characteristic equation. In the example given, the function y(t) = 2e^(-3t) - te^(-3t) does not oscillate despite crossing the origin, as it only crosses the t-axis once. The key distinction is that oscillation involves multiple crossings of the t-axis, while critical damping allows for a single crossing. The negative coefficient for c2 does not indicate oscillation; it simply affects the rate at which the system approaches equilibrium. Understanding this distinction clarifies the behavior of critically damped systems.
austinmw89
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm having a problem understanding a critical damping model. I know critical damping is supposed to return the system to equilibrium as quickly as possible without oscillating, and a critically damped system will have repeated roots so the general solution will be: c1e^rt + c2te^rt

But what happens when c2 is negative, for instance when solving y''+6y'+9y=0, y(pi)=-(pi-2)e^(-3pi), y'(pi)=(3pi-7)e^(-3pi), the characteristic equation is r^2 +6r +9, r =-3 repeated, then solving for the initial conditions I get: c1=2, c2=-1, then:

y(t)=2e^(-3t) -te^(-3t)

This function drops quickly to 0 at t=2, but then it crosses the origin. I thought it wasn't supposed to oscillate since it's critically damped? I've never taken a physics class so I think I must be missing some physical intuition or something here. Any help is appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not missing anything. Oscillation means it will cross the t-axis repeatedly. If the system crosses just once, it's not oscillating.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K