Debunking the False Proof of x^TAx=0 and A Being Antisymmetric Matrix

  • Thread starter lukaszh
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the conversation is discussing a proof where the hypothesis is that x^TAx=0 and the conclusion is that A is an antisymmetric matrix. The speaker points out that the proof is invalid because it starts by asserting what it wants to prove. They also mention that the proof only works for real scalars and not complex scalars.
  • #1
lukaszh
32
0
hi,
what is wrong about this proof?
If [tex]x^TAx=0[/tex] then A is antisymetric matrix. True? false?
P: False
[tex]A=-A^T[/tex]
[tex]x^TAx=-x^TA^Tx[/tex]
[tex]x^TAx=-(Ax)^Tx[/tex]
[tex]x^TAx=-\lambda\Vert x\Vert^2[/tex]
If x^T.A.x is zero, then must be [tex]-\lambda\Vert x\Vert^2[/tex], but ||x|| is real nonzero number and lambda must be zero. But antisymetric matrix has imaginary eigenvalues [tex]b\mathrm{i}[/tex], and 0 is not in this form. So
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
lukaszh said:
hi,
what is wrong about this proof?
If [tex]x^TAx=0[/tex] then A is antisymetric matrix. True? false?
P: False
[tex]A=-A^T[/tex]
[tex]x^TAx=-x^TA^Tx[/tex]
[tex]x^TAx=-(Ax)^Tx[/tex]
[tex]x^TAx=-\lambda\Vert x\Vert^2[/tex]
If x^T.A.x is zero, then must be [tex]-\lambda\Vert x\Vert^2[/tex], but ||x|| is real nonzero number and lambda must be zero. But antisymetric matrix has imaginary eigenvalues [tex]b\mathrm{i}[/tex], and 0 is not in this form. So

You started the proof by writing down the false thing!?
 
  • #3
It's not exactly "writing down the false thing" but you start your proof asserting what you want to prove. It is an invalid proof.

If your hypothesis is that [itex]x^TAx= 0[/itex] for some x, then the statement is certainly not true.
 
  • #4
What field are you working with? I'm assuming real scalars since you wrote [tex]x^T[/tex] instead of [tex]x^*[/tex].

If

[tex]x^T A x = 0[/tex] for every x in a real vector space, then it means that x and Ax must always be orthogonal.

If

[tex]x^* A x = 0[/tex] for every x in a complex vector space, then this actually implies that A = 0.
 

FAQ: Debunking the False Proof of x^TAx=0 and A Being Antisymmetric Matrix

What is false proof?

False proof, also known as a false proof or false argument, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is presented as being true when in fact it is not supported by evidence or reasoning. It is a form of deception or manipulation used to persuade others to believe something that is not true.

How is false proof different from a valid argument?

A valid argument is one that is supported by evidence and follows logical reasoning. False proof, on the other hand, may appear to be valid but is actually based on false or misleading information. While a valid argument leads to a true conclusion, false proof leads to a false or unsupported conclusion.

What are some common examples of false proof?

Some common examples of false proof include cherry-picking evidence, using faulty statistics, making logical fallacies, and relying on anecdotal evidence. Other examples include using emotional manipulation and appealing to authority without proper evidence to support the argument.

How can false proof be harmful?

False proof can be harmful in several ways. It can lead to incorrect decisions, harm relationships and trust, and perpetuate false beliefs. It can also have serious consequences in fields such as science, politics, and law, where decisions based on false proof can have far-reaching effects on individuals and society.

What are some strategies for identifying false proof?

One strategy for identifying false proof is to critically examine the evidence and reasoning presented in an argument. Look for any logical fallacies, inconsistencies, or lack of supporting evidence. Another strategy is to seek out multiple sources and perspectives to help determine the validity of an argument. Additionally, being aware of common tactics used in false proof, such as emotional manipulation or cherry-picking evidence, can also aid in identifying it.

Similar threads

Back
Top