MHB Decrease in Potential Energy of a Sliding Tile

AI Thread Summary
A tile with a mass of 1.2 kg slides 3 meters down a roof at a 35-degree angle, resulting in a decrease in potential energy. The correct calculation for potential energy is PE = mgh, where g is approximated as 10 m/s², leading to a value of 20.6 J. The initial calculation of 24.8 J was incorrect due to an error in the height used in the formula. The discussion highlights confusion over using g = 10 m/s² instead of the more precise 9.8 m/s². Accurate calculations are crucial for determining potential energy in physics problems.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A tile of mass 1.2 kg slides 3m down a roof that makes an angle of 35 degree to the horizontal. Find the decrease in potential energy.
Iam getting the ans 24.8J
PE = mgh= 1.2× 12 sin 35 ×3
The ans in the textbook is 20.6J
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea but something went wrong.

Your mistake: PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)). Where did you get the 12 from?

PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)) = 20.6 J.

(You have to use a Scientific calculator anyway, so I don't understand why you would be told to use g = 10 m/s^2 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. I think it's silly!)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
You have the right idea but something went wrong.

Your mistake: PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)). Where did you get the 12 from?

PE = mgh = 1.2 x 10 x (3 x sin(35)) = 20.6 J.

(You have to use a Scientific calculator anyway, so I don't understand why you would be told to use g = 10 m/s^2 instead of 9.8 m/s^2. I think it's silly!)

-Dan
Thank you!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
873
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top