Deep Inelastic Scattering

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nasa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conditions under which the four-momentum transfer ##q^0## can be made zero in deep inelastic scattering by boosting the system, specifically when the electron mass is approximated to zero. It clarifies that this condition can hold true for any scattering angle, but the mass's significance varies with the angle, suggesting a fixed target frame without accounting for boosts. The distinction between spacelike and the condition of ##q^0 = 0## is emphasized, with spacelike indicating ##q^2 < 0##. Additionally, there is a note on correcting LaTeX formatting issues in the original post. The conversation concludes with a resolution to a related problem.
Nasa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider deep inelastic scattering, where a high energy electron collides with a proton. The initial momentum of the electron is ##k^{\mu}## , the final state momentum is ##k'^{\mu}## , and the scattering angle is ##\theta##.
(1) Show that the transfer momentum ##q(=k-k')## is spatial in the limit where the electron mass is ignored.
(2) Find the scattering angle at which the electron mass cannot be ignored.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega dE} $$

$$= \frac{\alpha^2}{4E^2}\frac{X}{\cos^2} \frac{\theta}{2}\sin^4$$

$$\frac{\theta}{2}(\frac{1}{\nu} F_2(x,Q)+\frac{2}{M}F_1(x,Q) \tan^2 \frac{\theta}{2})$$

where ##Q^2=-q^2,\quad x=\frac{Q^2}{2p\cdot q}##
To make ##q^0## 0, we just need to boost it so that ##|\boldsymbol{k}^{2}=|\boldsymbol{k}′|## ~.

$$q^0=k−k′=\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}^2}−\sqrt{m_e^2+\boldsymbol{k}′^2}$$

But this is possible regardless of the approximation $m_e\to0$. What does it mean when it says that ##q^0## becomes 0 by approximating the electron mass to 0?

Also this is possible for any scattering angle $\theta$, but since it says that the mass cannot be ignored depending on the scattering angle ##\theta##, I assume that it is fixed to a Fixed Target frame and boosting is not taken into account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
 
Orodruin said:
Spacelike does not mean ##q^0 = 0##. It means ##q^2 < 0##.
So "spatial" means spacelike (##q^2<0##). Now I have solved problem 1! Thank you.
 
Hi Nasa,

I tried to fix your latex, which, I think, had an added close brace that caused other expressions to not render correctly.

Maybe you can look at your post and fix it the way you want

Also, notice the {X} I added because it seemed your \frac was missing a denominator.

Jedi
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top