- #36
mma
- 253
- 3
mma said:I suspect that [tex]\mathrm{grad}(a_x) = \dot{\gamma}[/tex].
Here [tex]a_x(y) := d(x,y)[/tex], the distance between x and y (I forgot to mention this in my previous post), and [tex]\gamma[/tex] is a geodesic through x, parametrized by its arc length)
So, my question is: how can I prove this?
Because the level sets of the distance function are perpedicular to the gradient vector of it, and these level sets are n-1-dimensional submanifolds, it would be enough to prove that the geodesics passing through x are always perpedicular to the level sets of the [tex]d(x,y)[/tex] distance function. Could anybody prove this?
Last edited: