Density Matrix (pure state) Property

Toten
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I need some help to prove the first property of the density matrix for a pure state.
According to this property, the density matrix is definite positive (or semi-definite positive). I've been trying to prove it mathematically, but I can't.

I need to prove that |a|^2 x |c|^2 + |b|^2 x |d|^2 + ab*c*d + a*bcd* >= 0,
where a, b, c, and d are complex numbers, and * means the complex conjugate.

My Density Matrix M (2x2) has the following elements:
m11 = |a|^2, m12 = ab*, m21 = a*b, m22 = |b|^2

And (c; d) is just a ket in the C2 space.

I hope you can help me. Thanks you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even if the density matrix is defined for a ensemble of spinors, the property holds true. How can you prove it?
 
Probably you have that |a|^2+|b|^2=1, because trace should be 1.

You matrix is Hermitian. Trace is the sum of eigenvalues, determinant is the product of eigenvalues. The determinant of your matrix is zero. Therefore one of the eigenvalues is zero, the other must be 1. Therefore your matrix is semi-positive definite.
 
arkajad said:
Probably you have that |a|^2+|b|^2=1, because trace should be 1.

You matrix is Hermitian. Trace is the sum of eigenvalues, determinant is the product of eigenvalues. The determinant of your matrix is zero. Therefore one of the eigenvalues is zero, the other must be 1. Therefore your matrix is semi-positive definite.

Thank you! I hadn't realize that the determinant of the density matrix is zero. This gave me an idea on how to reorganize the terms in the following expression:

|a|^2 x |c|^2 + |b|^2 x |d|^2 + ab*c*d + a*bcd*
= aa*cc* + bb*dd* + ab*c*d + a*bcd*
= ac*a*c + bd*b*d + ac*b*d + bd*a*c
= ac*(a*c + b*d) + bd*(b*d + a*c)
= ac*(a*c + b*d) + bd*(a*c + b*d)
= (ac* + bd*)(a*c + b*d)
= (ac* + bd*)(ac* + bd*)*
= |ac* + bd*|^2, which is always greater than or equal to zero.

I don't know if this is the easiest way to prove it, but it is definitely one way.

Thanks for your help!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top