Density of State for a two atom basis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the density of states for a diatomic system in one dimension using the Debye model. The participant is uncertain whether to use the same density of states equation as for monatomic systems, noting that density of states is influenced by dimensionality and dispersion relations. They highlight that the group velocity for a diatomic setup will differ, potentially being twice that of a monatomic case, which implies a halving of the density of states. The participant also attempted to relate the integral of the density of states to the number of particles in the lattice. Ultimately, they submitted their assignment and are awaiting feedback on their approach.
Mattszo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem on my assignment in which I am required to find the specific heat of a two atom basis (diatomic) using the Debye model. My problem is coming up with the density of states for a diatomic setup in 1D.


Homework Equations



Density of state: g(w)=\frac{L}{\pi}\frac{1}{\frac{dw}{dq}} in 1D
g(w) = \frac{L}{π\upsilon_{s}} where \upsilon_{s} is speed of sound, L is a length of lattice constant in 1D
dispersion relationship w=\upsilon_{s}q in 1D


The Attempt at a Solution



My book says the Density of States equation shares properties with the monatomic setup.
I don't know if repeating the same equation is right because density of state depends on dimentionality (1D) and dispersion relation, which seem the same for monatomic and diatomic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the density of states tells you how many states there are for each of your particles to occupy. the dispersion relation in for 2 particles, has a similar form, and i believe it is for you to solve the wave equations to get the 2 dimensional dispersion relation.
as a result your group velocity vs is different than the one for the mono-atomic case. it will be a tensor in general, but you are only interested in its magnitude, and since vectors add, assuming the two particles have the same magnitude but independent wave vectors, the group velocity will be twice that of the mono-atomic case, and so the density of states will be halved.
 
I have to find it in one dimension. I tried something else and that was to take the integral g(w)dw with limits 0 to the Debye frequency and equate it to = (# of dimensions) times N where N is the number of particles in the lattice. In this case, the integral is equal to 1N.

Anyways I handed in my assignment already and I guess I will just see what the actual answer is. Thank you for the help!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top