Derivation/origin of two equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter thewall12
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two equations related to the scattering of electric fields and dipole moments. The first equation describes the amplitude of a scattered electric field, incorporating the dipole moment and the angle between the dipole and line of sight, but lacks clear literature references. The second equation for the scattered dipole moment suggests oscillation in space, raising questions about the nature of dipole oscillation, which is typically time-dependent. The user is seeking clarification on the origins and implications of these equations for their problem. Understanding these equations is crucial for grasping the underlying physics of dipole scattering.
thewall12
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I've encountered two equations and I'm not sure of their origins. First, there's a differential equation describing the amplitude of a scattered electric field, E=(1/(c^2*r))*dp/dt sin y, where p is the scattered dipole moment and gamma (y) is the angle between the dipole moment and line of sight. The equation makes enough sense, I guess. I'm just not able to find any literature on it or its origin. Also, I'm not sure where the equation for the scattered dipole moment, p=po*exp(-ik(r-ct)), comes from. The r indicates that the dipole is oscillating in space, but if it's a dipole particle it can only oscillate in time, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help. I'm in desperate need of an answer for this problem I have.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top