Derive Reissner Nordstrom Eq. (8) Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter darida
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
darida
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
I want to derive Reissner Nordstrom solution using this paper as a guide: http://gmammado.mysite.syr.edu/notes/RN_Metric.pdf, but I get confused by the Eq. (8). Why the Enstein's equation can be rewritten in that form and what is the physical meaning of the Eq. (8)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Contract both sides of (3) with ##g^{\mu\nu}## and you will get a condition for ##R##
 
  • Like
Likes darida
Ah thank you, that's so simple >_<
 
The trace of the energy-momentum tensor of a classical massless field vanishes because of symmetry under dilations. Now use the hint in #2.
 
  • Like
Likes darida
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top