Deriving Energy and Wave Functions from 3D Schrödinger

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the energy levels and wave functions for a three-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO) with quantum numbers nx, ny, nz and frequency ω0. The user expresses confusion over the order of solving the problem parts, suggesting they should derive the wave function before the energy levels. They attempt to formulate the wave function but struggle to incorporate the quantum numbers into their expression. The potential energy is correctly identified, but the user is uncertain about how to relate the wave function to the ground state without the n values. The conversation highlights the complexities of deriving solutions in quantum mechanics, particularly for multi-dimensional systems.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a quantum harmonic oscillator with quantum numbers nx,ny,nz ≥ 0 and frequency ω0. There are three parts to the problem. To me it seems they are out of order, but I'm kind of shaky deriving these.

a) Write down the energy level Enx,ny,nz of a QHO in 3d with quantum numbers nx,ny,nz ≥ 0 and frequency ω0?

b) Write down the normalized wave function for the ground state ψ0(x,y,z)?

c) What is the Schrödinger equation for the generic 3d wave function ψnx,ny,nz(x,y,z)?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



To me I think one would solve this c, b, a. I can state a and b first by copying out of the book, but I'd rather derive them since that's the correct method. The only thing I cannot figure out what my wave function is to involve the energy levels.

My guess for the wave equation is...

\psi (x,y,z) = Ae^{\frac{1}{2}(x^2 +y^2 +z^2)}

But I am missing my energy levels n. So I know that is wrong.

My 3d Schrödinger equation equation in this case is...

Well first the potential is given by...

U(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}\vec{r}^2~=~\frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}(x^2+y^2+z^2)

Back to my Schrödinger...

\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2m} \nabla ^2 \psi (\vec{r}) +U(\vec{r}) \psi (\vec{r}) = E \psi (\vec{r})

So. Where I am confused is guessing my wave equation and then solving for the energy.

I thought I would have to do the order like I posted above, but the question is worded differently. Maybe I am more confused then I thought. :)

The steps I would do is write out my Schrödinger, use separation of variables, solve for my wave equation, then find the energy. But I'm not fully sure since I won't have my n values.

Hopefully this makes sense. I've been up for a while and am having some trouble explaining what I've done so far. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So my wave equation isn't correct.

I believe it should be

<br /> \psi (x,y,z) = Ae^{\frac{\alpha}{2}(x^2 +y^2 +z^2)}<br />

Where α = mω/ℏ

However the problem states to write down the normalized wave function for the ground state! I don't have any n terms in my wave equation and therefore have no way to relate it to the ground state.

If this were a box, I'd have sin terms and n terms, and I'd be set. However I see no way to incorporate n into this type of wave function.

Any ideas?

On a side note: should I have put this in advanced physics?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top