Descriptive question on interaction states and mass states.

AI Thread Summary
Interaction states refer to the state of a particle before it acquires mass through the Higgs mechanism, while mass states are the resultant states after mass is conferred. Physical states are identified as mass states, which are the ones typically represented in Feynman diagrams. Feynman diagrams predominantly depict mass states, such as electrons, rather than interaction states, which are mixtures of left-handed and right-handed components. The discussion highlights the distinction between these states and their representation in particle physics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping particle interactions and their visual representations in theoretical frameworks.
LisaH89
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are interaction states and what are mass states? Which ones are physical
states? Which ones appear in Feynman diagrams? Explain your answer.


I have that an interaction state is the state of a particle before the Higgs mechanism and the mass state is after the Higgs mechanism has given the particle mass.

Is this correct? And can anyone help with the rest of the question?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sheffield uni by any chance?
I've just asked this question in another section.
also your answer is what I heard yesterday.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I am! Did you get an answer for the rest of it?
 
the physical states are the mass states I think.

As for the Feynman diagrams, I think they use the physical/mass states too because I can't remember ever drawing or seeing a diagram where there's been interaction states on it. they are always made with, say, an electron e rather than using the interaction states (eL eR) that it is a mixture of... in my experience anyway.

good luck tomorrow anyway it's going to be a right ***** of an exam.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top