Designing a lowpass Butterworth filter

  • Thread starter Thread starter rusty009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Designing Filter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing a lowpass Butterworth filter with specific parameters: a passband edge of 10 kHz, a stopband edge of 30 kHz, a minimum stopband attenuation of 50 dB, and a maximum passband attenuation of 0.4 dB. The user is struggling to determine the filter order, resulting in complex numbers from their calculations using the provided formula. There is a suggestion that Butterworth filters are less efficient compared to Chebyshev and elliptic filters, which offer better performance with fewer components. The conversation also includes a recommendation to use FilterCad software for design assistance. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of designing Butterworth filters and suggests exploring alternative filter types for improved results.
rusty009
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am trying to design a lowpass filter using the following conditions

Passband edge f = 10 Khz (Ωp)
passband stop f = 30 Khz (Ωs)
Minimum stopband attenuation = 50db (1/A)
Maximum passband attenuation = 0.4db( 1/\sqrt{1+ε<sup>2</sup>} )

and am having quite a lot of trouble with it. I have tried to determine the order but it comes out as a complex number, the formula I am using is,

n= log( ε/\sqrt{(A<sup>2</sup>-1)})/log(Ω[/B]ps)

can anyone help me out? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
There, download FilterCad:
http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/

By the way, Butterworth is just the worst of all filters except the straight wire. Huge number of poles and components for a given selectivity, AND by far worst pulse response for a given selectivity. Chebychev is better, elliptic even better, and inverse (or type II) Chebychev better.

So unless some kind of teacher imposes you the Chebychev, take a more sensible option.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Back
Top