Designing MFB Bandpass Filters: Frequency, Bandwidth, and Gain Formula Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing Multiple Feedback Bandpass Filters (MFB) with specific parameters, including frequency, bandwidth, and gain. The user is trying to understand how to manipulate gain in their filter design, noting that the gain should ideally be unity. They reference a schematic that appears to have inconsistencies in resistor values, leading to confusion about the gain calculation. Through analysis and reverse-engineering of an MFB component calculator, they propose that the gain can be determined by the formula Gain = R3/(2*R1). The conversation concludes with a request for clarification on the role of additional components in the circuit.
Deepsatchel
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am attempting to come up with a systematic way to design Multiple Feedback bandpass filters with certain specifications.

• Frequency is some given number
• Bandwidth varies with Frequency by
f0*2^13/12
• The Q should therefore be .4719
• The gain should be 1

I am at an understanding of how to manipulate Frequency and Q (BW follows), but I am having trouble finding information on how to manipulate gain. I am using the following topology:

http://sound.westhost.com/articles/af-f6.gif

With that background, which may prove irrelevant to my actual question, how is the gain for this MFB calculated? Rod Elliott, the author of the above picture, claims that that happens to be a unity gain filter, but does not explain why this is so.

I read a TI note that gave a gain formula for an MFB, but it was a slightly different design. The formula was a simple resistor ratio. Can anyone figure out the gain for this one?

I may have more questions after I sleep on it. Thanks in advance everyone.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your schematic has two C2's and both are 10nF. There are also two R2's, but one is 40k and the other is 80k. I'm thinking that there is a mistake, that they should both have the same value, just like the two caps. In that case, the gain at the center frequency will just be R2/R2 = 1.
 
You are right, there is something strange about that schematic. I think the resistor to ground should be labelled an R3, as the ubiquitous formula for MFB frequency involves 3 resistor values.

Here is another schematic that shows correct lettering.

bandpass.gif


Rod Elliott, god bless his soul, also provides an MFB component calculator available for download. You put in the components and it tells you Frequency, Gain, and Q, or vice versa. So what I've done is reverse-engineered some of the results from that calculator as it relates to Gain. R1 and R3 (referencing the above) are the only two that affect gain.

Looking at the results, it quickly became clear that the ratio is Gain = R3/(2*R1)

Does that seem correct? It is possible that the calculator is wrong, I'm hoping to be able to analyze this thing for myself and be able to infer the gain.
 
Sorry for the double post, but I think I see it. When the input signal is at F0, the capacitors "disappear," and you are left with something more like this:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/Op-Amp_Inverting_Amplifier.svg

Could anyone shed some light on what effect the R2 from above might have?
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Back
Top