Determine the intensity profile and fwhm for gaussian beam.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the intensity profile and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of a Gaussian beam with a wavelength of 600 nm and an initial FWHM of 1 mm, evaluated at a distance of 10 meters. The equation for FWHM is provided, but participants express confusion regarding the lack of information about the beam waist or the distance to it, which is crucial for solving the problem. The need for clarification on what "initially" refers to in the context of the question is emphasized, as it impacts the calculation. Participants suggest that without additional details, one can only speculate on the intended meaning. The conversation highlights the importance of precise information in physics problems to arrive at a definitive solution.
Aerozeppelin
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam of wavelength 600 nm has initially an intensity profile of Gaussian shape with a
fwhm of 1 mm. Determine the intensity profile and fwhm 10 meter away.

Homework Equations



FWHM = λ/(2NA√(1 + I/Is))

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
FWHM1 = 1mm = 600 nm/(2NA√(1 + I/Is))

(2NA√(1 + I/Is)) = 0.0006m
NA2(1+ I/Is) = 0.00015

10meters away :

NA2(1+ I/Is) = (0.00015)/10 = 0.000015
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is the initial information are given? Is it at the beam waist?
 
This is all the information given!
 
You have to know either the beam waist diameter or the distance between the initial plane and the beam waist. Without these information you can only guess what the question maker means with "initially" in the question's wording.
 
There must be a solution as it was on an exam?
 
If I were to face such a problem in an exam, exactly worded as you have written, I would be most likely not overwhelmed by shyness to ask the prof for a greater detail about the initial plane.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top