Determining Molar Solubility of Mg(OH)2 in MgCl2 Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molar solubility of Mg(OH)2 in an 8.62 x 10^-2 M MgCl2 solution, given its Ksp of 1.8 x 10^-11. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately setting up the reaction equation, which is Mg(OH)2(s) <-> Mg2+(aq) + 2 OH-(aq), and acknowledge that the initial concentration of Mg2+ from MgCl2 must be considered in the calculations. The use of an ICE table is suggested to track the changes in concentrations, although it is noted that this can lead to a complex polynomial equation. The discussion highlights the need to account for the existing magnesium ions in the solution when determining the solubility of Mg(OH)2. Overall, the conversation revolves around clarifying the correct approach to solving the solubility problem while addressing common misconceptions.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



What is the molar solubility of Mg(OH)2 (Ksp1.8*10-11) in8.62*10-2M MgCl2 (aq)?



Homework Equations

Chemistry is awwweeesssommmmeee...



The Attempt at a Solution



Okay. Here goes. But mind you, I have not put my all into this course, so I will probably need a good slap in the face every now and again when I make a silly assumption or ask a stupid question

The first thing I need to do is write the reaction, which I am guessing is

Mg(OH)_2\rightarrow 2OH+Mg but I am not entirely sure why. That is, don't I need to include the water or something? Or do we just assume it does not participate?



Next I will construct an ice table.. arrg what's that array command again...

\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Mg(OH)_2 &amp; 2OH &amp; Mg \\8.62*10^{-2} &amp; 0 &amp; 0\\ -s &amp; +2s &amp; +s\\ 8.62*10^{-2}-s &amp; 2s &amp; s\end{array}\right]

This may be wrong (probably). Maybe I did need to include the water. I assumed that the concentration of the Mg(OH)2 was equal to that of the MgCl2

I don't think that is correct. Can I get some guidance from here?

Thanks,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You starting concentration of Mg(OH)2 is 0.

However, you already have dissolved magnesium in the solution, so initial concentration of Mg2+ is not 0.

Using ICE table is not a bad idea, but it will be tricky. Your first column - the one with dissolved solid - will remain unchanged. You will have only two columns - one for magnesium and one for OH-. That's the easy part. It will yield third degree polynomial, that's the hard part.

However, you can start assuming that you know concentration of Mg2+ - after all it should not change substantially. Use it to calculate concentration of OH- in saturated solution, that will give you information about amount of dissolved Mg(OH)2. Finally check, if your initial assumption (that concentration of Mg2+ won't change substantially) was valid.
 
So then my reaction is not written correctly then? That is what is most difficult for me, is setting up the reaction.

If the [Mg(OH)2]0=0 then the rxn Mg(OH)_2\rightarrow 2OH+Mg can have no meaning.

So what is the correct rxn ?
 
Mg(OH)2(s) <-> Mg2+(aq) + 2 OH-(aq)

You start with a solid hydroxide, so its concentration is 0.

Don't ignore charges when dealing with ions.
 
I do not see how this reaction makes sense (but that's why I suck at chemistry).

Why isn't the MgCl2 included in the rxn ?
 
Because it doesn't react, it is just dissolved.

However, solubility product tells you when Mg(OH)2 will start to precipitate - when [Mg2+][OH-]2 will be higher than the given value. So [Mg2+][OH-]2 product can't be never higher than Kso. When there was already Mg2+ there is the same limit - just now there exist some initial concentration of Mg2+, so when Mg(OH)2 dissolves you should take this original concentration into account.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K