Determining the total distance a solid sphere will roll.

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the total distance a marble travels on a flat cardboard surface involves understanding the rolling resistance and friction between the two materials. The coefficient of static friction is known, but the coefficient of rolling resistance is necessary for accurate distance estimation. Without experimental data on rolling resistance, it's challenging to predict how far the marble will roll after being propelled. The marble will eventually stop due to rolling friction, which must be measured experimentally. Accurate calculations depend on these coefficients to determine the marble's motion.
smalveh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys not sure if this belongs in the homework section, anyway here goes!
I'm trying to calculate the total distance a marble (I'm modeling it as non-deformable solid sphere) will travel along a flat cardboard surface (I'm also assuming the cardboard does not deform).
The sphere will initially be propelled by a known external force, it can be assumed that the sphere will not slip.
I've tried figuring this out by calculating the rolling resistance that acts on the marble as it moves across the surface, but it seems that this is not possible without knowing the coefficient of rolling resistance between the marble and the cardboard surface.
I'm quite sure I could figure out the total distance if I knew the magnitude of the friction acting on the sphere because I also know the speed at which the marble is launched.
I know the coefficient of static friction between the two surfaces as well if that helps in any way.

Any way thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see any method to estimate the rolling resistance without any data except the static friction. Measure it, and calculate it based on the measurements?
 
If the marble and surface don't deform, how will there be any resistance?
 
The marble will stop only because of rolling friction and that, I believe, has to be calculated experimentally
 
ashishsinghal said:
The marble will stop only because of rolling friction and that, I believe, has to be calculated experimentally

I thought this would end up being the case ashishsinghal.
Thanks for your help anyway guys.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top