Difference between 2-point and 4-point function in QFT

Higgsy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
As I understand it, the 2-point fnuction is for 1 particle incoming, 1 particle outgoing. The 4-point function is for 2 particles incoming, 2 particles outgoing. Is this correct? So an N-point function describes N/2 incoming particles and N/2 outgoing particles?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The N-point function corresponds to N "external" particles, any of which can be incoming or outgoing. So the four-point function could be one incoming and three outgoing, or three incoming and one outgoing. Of course, if you're eventually interested in all external particles being on-shell to calculate amplitudes (which I assume you do here since you're trying to speak of particles incoming/outgoing), then you should conserve energy/momentum between initial and final states, which constrains certain configurations - e.g. you can't have two incoming and zero outgoing.

Sometimes we're interested in the N-point function off-shell, in which case it's not that meaningful to think of particles as incoming/outgoing.
 
Oh that makes sense. When would we be interested in the off-shell N-point function?
 
It is often the easiest way to renormalize the theory. You renormalize by setting some N-point functions evaluated at a specific value of "external" momenta to a renormalized coupling, and then replace all bare couplings with renormalized couplings. This is usually simplest with an off-shell choice, though you could choose them on-shell.

It's also useful because you can put your N-point function as a sub-diagram of a larger diagram, where your original N-point function is now integrated over some of its momentum values. There are also some advanced applications which use the analytic structure of N-point functions as a function of the external momenta.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
350
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top