Differences in problems between fundamentals of physics and principles

In summary, fundamentals of physics and principles are two closely related concepts in the field of physics. Fundamentals of physics focus on the basic laws and principles that govern the physical world, while principles in physics refer to the underlying concepts and theories that explain these laws and principles. They are used in scientific research to understand and explain the physical world, make predictions and calculations, and develop new technologies. While someone without a strong background in physics may be able to understand these concepts, it may require a significant amount of time and effort to fully grasp them.
  • #1
Idan9988
9
0
There is a difference in the questions (amount, difficulty) between fundamentals of physics extended 11th edition and principles of physics 11th edition? And both textbooks treat the theory the same in terms of derivations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Unless you provide the names of the authors, we will not know what books you are talking about. There are many books with essentially the same title.

jason
 
  • #3
jasonRF said:
Unless you provide the names of the authors, we will not know what books you are talking about. There are many books with essentially the same title.

jason
Halliday, Resnick and walker
 

FAQ: Differences in problems between fundamentals of physics and principles

What is the difference between fundamentals of physics and principles?

The fundamentals of physics refer to the basic concepts and laws that explain the behavior of matter and energy in the physical world. These include topics such as motion, forces, energy, and thermodynamics. Principles, on the other hand, are general rules or guidelines that govern a particular field or subject. In the context of physics, principles are often derived from the fundamentals and help to explain more complex phenomena.

How do the problems in fundamentals of physics differ from those in principles?

The problems in fundamentals of physics typically involve solving equations and applying mathematical concepts to understand and predict the behavior of physical systems. These problems are often more quantitative and require a strong foundation in mathematics. Problems in principles, on the other hand, may involve more conceptual understanding and application of principles to real-world situations.

Are the fundamentals of physics and principles equally important?

Both fundamentals of physics and principles are essential for understanding and explaining the physical world. However, the fundamentals provide the foundation upon which principles are built. Without a solid understanding of the fundamentals, it would be challenging to apply principles to new or complex problems.

Can you give an example of a problem that would fall under fundamentals of physics versus principles?

A problem involving calculating the acceleration of an object due to gravity would fall under fundamentals of physics. This problem would require knowledge of the fundamental laws of motion and the concept of gravitational force. An example of a problem that would fall under principles could be determining the efficiency of a machine based on the principles of work and energy.

How can understanding the differences between fundamentals of physics and principles benefit us?

Understanding the differences between fundamentals of physics and principles can help us to approach problems in a more organized and systematic way. By recognizing which concepts fall under fundamentals and which fall under principles, we can better understand the relationships between different physical phenomena and apply our knowledge to solve complex problems.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top