Differential cross section/simple integral

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around integrating the differential cross section to retrieve the total cross section, sigma(naught). The user initially struggles with obtaining a logarithmic term during integration, which indicates a potential misstep in their approach. It is clarified that the correct substitution involves using sin(theta) d theta d phi for the solid angle differential, d Omega. The correct relationship is established as d sigma equals sigma_0 over 4 pi multiplied by sin(theta) d theta d phi. The user acknowledges the guidance and expresses appreciation for the clarification.
jonwell
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
At least it should be a simple integral...

Homework Statement



The whole text is here- http://i35.tinypic.com/2nisnp.jpg

Basically (I think) I need to integrate the differential over all angles theta and phi, and get sigma(naught) back out.


Homework Equations



given in pic

The Attempt at a Solution



If I use the given substitution and integrate I get log(tan(pi/2)) which is log(0) which is broken... I don't really know where to go other than that.

Thanks! Been reading the forum for a long time but this is my first question :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You shouldn't be getting any Log terms when you integrate; if you show me your work, I can tell you where you are going wrong.
 
I substitute sin(theta) for d(omega), and the integral for 1/sin(theta) is log(tan(theta/2)) at least as given by mathematica and the back of my book.

I kind of figured I shouldn't be getting that, which is what makes me think I'm approaching the problem all out of whack.
 
You should be substituting sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi for d \Omega not just sin(\theta)...d \Omega is a differential, sin(\theta) is just a function...you should have:

\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}=\frac{d \sigma}{sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi}=\frac{\sigma_0}{4 \pi}

\Rightarrow d \sigma=\frac{\sigma_0}{4 \pi} sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi

...do you follow?

Then just integrate both sides of the equation.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
You should be substituting sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi for d \Omega not just sin(\theta)...d \Omega is a differential, sin(\theta) is just a function...you should have:

\frac{d \sigma}{d \Omega}=\frac{d \sigma}{sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi}=\frac{\sigma_0}{4 \pi}

\Rightarrow d \sigma=\frac{\sigma_0}{4 \pi} sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi

...do you follow?

Then just integrate both sides of the equation.


I figured it was something simple. I follow perfectly, thank you very much :)

[...I need to figure out that LaTeX code stuff, that's pretty cool.]
 
Your welcome. There's an introduction to LaTeX here :smile:
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top