I Diffraction of point source/s and duality

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
TL;DR Summary
1 point source and 2 points on a screen, only quantum duality explains this ?
Consider 1 and 2 point sources. Then corpuscular view gives a single peak in those cases, whereas considering the undulation of a quantity along the path gives fringes in both cases.

My question is : is it true that the case single point source gives a single peak and two would give fringes. The point is that only the duality wave/particle of quantum mechanics can explain this (for example collision of particles from several point sources does not exhibit interferences)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
is it true that the case single point source gives a single peak and two would give fringes.
No. A singe slit produces a single-slit diffraction pattern and the math we use to calculate this pattern (no QM involved, it's classical wave mechanics, well understood in the 19th century) and we use the same equations to calculate the pattern. The only difference is the initial conditions - one slit open or two.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
I mean an idealized point source not a slit. But quantum mechanics could be involved by computing the diffusion of a delta function or 2 and superposing the resulting wavefunction at different times. In the case of one source, the wf after the source is a chirp of modulus 1, but the factor in front is 1/t. Knowing the particle is traveling at c, ##t=\sqrt{x^2+d^2}## with d the distance to screen, this gives a Lorentzian at power dimension of speed's space divided by 2.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top