Dimensional analysis - atomic bomb explosion radius

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using dimensional analysis to derive the relationship between the radius of an atomic explosion's shock wave and various parameters like energy, time, and ambient conditions. The initial expression, R = (Et^2/ρ₀)g(π₁), is questioned for its homogeneity, as the units of R do not match those of the right-hand side. It is confirmed that π₁ can be expressed as π₁ = (p₀R³/E), which is dimensionally consistent. Participants agree that the original expression is not homogeneous, suggesting that the term (Et²/ρ₀) should be raised to the power of 1/5 to correct the dimensional inconsistency. This highlights the importance of unit analysis in physical equations.
vector
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

:[/B]

An atomic explosion can be approximated as the release of a large amount of energy ##E## from a point source. The explosion results in an expanding spherical fireball bounded by powerful shock wave. Let ##R## be the radius of the shock wave and assume that ##R=f(E,T,\rho_0, p_0)## where ##t## is the elapsed time after the explosion takes place, ##\rho_0## is the ambient air density and ##p_0## is the ambient air pressure. Using dimensional analysis show that ##R=\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}g(\pi_1)## where ##\pi_1## is a dimensionless variable. Choose it so that it involves ##E## to a negative exponent. What is ##\pi_1##?

Homework Equations



##R=f(E,T,\rho_0, p_0)##
##R=\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}g(\pi_1)## where ##\pi_1## is a dimensionless variable

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is that the relationship does not appear to be homogeneous. If ##\pi_1## is dimensionless, then the units of ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## must be the same as the units of ##R##. However,

##[E] = ML^2 T^{-2}##
##[t] = T##
##[\rho_0] = ML^{-3}##
##[p_0] = ML^{-1}T^{-2}##
##[R]=L##, where M is express in kilograms, T is in seconds, L is in meters.

What is it that I'm not getting right here?

On the other hand, I expressed ##\pi_1## as follows: ##\pi_1 = \frac{p_0 R^3}{E}##. Is this correct?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vector said:

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is that the relationship does not appear to be homogeneous. If ##\pi_1## is dimensionless, then the units of ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## must be the same as the units of ##R##. However,

##[E] = ML^2 T^{-2}##
##[t] = T##
##[\rho_0] = ML^{-3}##
##[p_0] = ML^{-1}T^{-2}##
##[R]=L##, where M is express in kilograms, T is in seconds, L is in meters.

What is it that I'm not getting right here?

On the other hand, I expressed ##\pi_1## as follows: ##\pi_1 = \frac{p_0 R^3}{E}##. Is this correct?

Thank you!
yes, it's correct. The dimension ##p_0 R^3## is same for E.
##ML^{-1}T^{-2}## * ##L^{3}## = ##ML^2T^{-2}##
 
Last edited:
majid313mirzae said:
yes, it's correct. The dimension ##p_0 R^3## is same for E.
##ML^{-1}T^{-2}## * ##L^{3}## = ##ML^2T^{-2}##

Thanks. But do you think the expression given in the problem statement is correct at all? The problem is that ##R## has units of ##L##, but ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## has units of ##L^{-5}##.
 
vector said:
Thanks. But do you think the expression given in the problem statement is correct at all? The problem is that ##R## has units of ##L##, but ##\frac{Et^2}{\rho_0}## has units of ##L^{-5}##.
unit of ##Et^2## is ##ML^2T^{-2} * T^2## then ##ML^2##
so unit of ##R## is ##\frac{ML^2}{ML{-3}}## = ##L^5##
 
Sorry, I meant ##L^5##. So then the expression is not quite homogeneous. Namely, the units of ##R## are ##L##, but the units of ##\frac{ET^2}{\rho_0}## are ##L^5##. Am I correct?
 
yes , you are. Below file can be useful
http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/42045/228875559.pdf?sequence=1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks. So, the ##\frac{ET^2}{\rho_0}## should be raised to the power of 1/5, shouldn't it?
 
vector said:
Thanks. So, the ##\frac{ET^2}{\rho_0}## should be raised to the power of 1/5, shouldn't it?

yes, it's right
 
Back
Top