Dimensional Analysis - Schrödinger equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying dimensional analysis to the harmonic oscillator's potential and energy in the context of the Schrödinger equation. Participants emphasize the need to express the potential V(x) and energies E_n in dimensionless forms by eliminating parameters like mass (m) and angular frequency (ω). The transformation involves using the characteristic length scale x_0 = sqrt(ħ/(mω)) to rewrite V in terms of (x/x_0). The conversation highlights the importance of identifying relationships among the equations to facilitate this reduction. Ultimately, the goal is to derive a dimensionless Schrödinger equation and express the allowed energies in a simplified manner.
astro_girl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To illustrate the abstract reduction to dimensionless quantities apply it to the harmonic oscillator
V(x) = (m \omega^2 x^2) / 2
using x_0 = sqrt(h-bar/(m \omega))
and fi nd a dimensionless Schrodinger equation. Translate the known solutions to the Schrodinger
equation for the harmonic oscillator E_n = (n + 1/2)h-bar\omega
into the allowed energies ~E of the dimensionless Schrodinger equation.

I know this has to do with dimensional analysis, but I was sick when we had that class, and I've been searching for help on the internet the whole day without any luck. I don't think it is too difficult, I just don't really get what I have to do.

I guess the \omega and the m have to go, but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use LaTeX if you surround your equations by double $ or double # (for inline mode).

Can you re-write V in such a way that it just has factors of (x/x_0) instead of x?
Can you do something similar for the energies?
 
Welcome to PF;
I agree with mfb, but would put it differently...
I guess the \omega and the m have to go, but how?
You eliminate them using your simultaneous equations.
LaTeX makes the equations clearer like this:

(1) $$V(x) = \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 x^2$$(2) $$x_0=\sqrt{ \frac{\hbar}{m\omega} }$$(are those correct?) i.e. for (2) don't you want ##x_0:V(x_0)=\frac{1}{2}\hbar## ?

Initially it looks like you have two equations and three unknowns - but ... notice how ##m\omega## always appear together in these equations? Maybe you can eliminate them together? (well... sort of)

... anyway - there's a third equation:
(3) $$E_n=\cdots$$

It will lead you down mfb's line... you are looking for ##V/E_n## in terms of ##x/x_0## ... treated that way you have three equations with three unknowns ... you just have to identify the unknowns. This you do by experience and you get that by trial and error.To see how I typeset the equations (essential for QM and useful elsewhere) just click on the "quote" button at the bottom of this post ;)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top