I've seen the derivation of Dirac Equation using Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group in L H Ryder's QFT book.Can anybody give some comprehensible descriptions of this method?
You could take a look at Srednicki's book (draft copy free online, google to find it), which starts with reps of the Lorentz group and slowly builds up to the Dirac lagrangian.
Incidentally, the Dirac equation can't really be derived, it is just postulated as following from the simplest lagrangian (that is, terms with the fewest derivatives) that can be written down for a field corresponding to spin-1/2 particles.
For the extreme version of this point of view, see Weinberg's book (which is thorough and extremely detailed, and therefore comprehensible, but only with a lot of effort).
#3
Fra
4,364
711
It's also interesting to note the relation between KG and Dirac eqs. You can by a special simple change of variables, transform the second order (KG equation) into a system of first order equations (Dirac), out pops tha pauli matrices.
I'm not sure what it prooves, but it's at least when coming from the classical path, an interesting insight about a possible mathematical relation between the spin ½ system and the spinless KG. It sort of allows for a kind of mathematical "interpretation" of what spin ½ is in terms of a "transformation" of a spinless system.
when I took the QM courses I don't recall this beeing the way it was shown in class but I just noted this myself when playing around, and found it to be an interesting curiosity.
/Fredrik
#4
massless
3
0
We can simply derive KG equation from Dirac equation. More generally ,even the Bargmann-Wigner equation which describes the higher spins can also lead to KG equation, but the fai function in the equation are totally different which result in the corresponding spin quantum numbers.
#5
nklohit
13
0
Thanks to everyone. I am trying Weinberg's and Srednicki's besides Ryder's.
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question.
Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition:
https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/
As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance"
But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works.
The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...