I Direction of motion of particles with total spin under magnetic field

sal1854
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
The magnetization force imposes paramagnetic materials to move in one direction. What about the fact that their unpaired electrons can have a spin up or down? Shouldn't they be able to move in both directions depending on the spin?
According to Chapter 8 of Griffiths' book Introduction to Electrodynamics, the magnetization force that acts on a magnetic dipole is

$$F_M=\nabla (m \cdot B)$$,

where ##m## is the magnetic moment and ##B## is the magnetic field.

For a paramagnetic or diamagnetic particle

$$m=\dfrac{\chi}{(1+\chi)\mu_0}B$$

where ##\chi## is the magnetic susceptibility (also shown in this wiki page [1]).

Therefore, if a particle is paramagnetic (##\chi>0##) the ##F_M## acting on it will be in the direction of the ##\nabla B^2## (and the opposite direction for a diamagnetic one)! So, all paramagnetic materials will move in the same direction?

What about the fact that the unpaired electrons of said paramagnetic particle can have a "spin-up" or "spin-down" (Stern–Gerlach experiment [2])? Shouldn't then the paramagnetic particles move randomly both "up" or "down" under the magnetization force??

Links:
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetization
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern–Gerlach_experiment
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sal1854 said:
For a paramagnetic or diamagnetic particle

$$m=\dfrac{\chi}{(1+\chi)\mu_0}B$$

where ##\chi## is the magnetic susceptibility (also shown in this wiki page [1]).
That's only true for particles without a permanent magnetic moment. What you get then is a field-induced magnetic moment.

If a particle has a permanent magnetic moment, then usually only this moment need be considered (unless the external field is very strong).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and topsquark
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
785
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top