B Do contracting muscles emit electric fields?

AI Thread Summary
Contracting muscles do emit electric fields, but detecting this activity is complex and often influenced by external factors. An EMF meter can pick up electric fields from the body, but it may primarily register interference from nearby AC wiring rather than muscle activity. The human body can affect radio signals similarly to a metal object, altering signal strength in its vicinity. Accurate measurement of electromagnetic fields requires well-calibrated equipment, and the interpretation of results can be challenging. Overall, while muscle activity generates electrical signals, the readings from an EMF meter are likely influenced more by environmental factors than by the body's emissions.
jaketodd
Gold Member
Messages
507
Reaction score
21
I bought an EMF meter that can discriminate to electric fields, and it is highly sensitive to the proximity of my body. What is it in the human body that emits electric fields? Is it muscle activity? Maybe many things in the body? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
People conduct radio energy. They pick it up from one place and retransmit it.
For example, if you are sitting close to a CRT (old TV or oscilloscope) you will be transmitting lots of EM.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes davenn and russ_watters
.Scott said:
People conduct radio energy. They pick it up from one place and retransmit it.
For example, if you are sitting close to a CRT (old TV or oscilloscope) you will be transmitting lots of EM.
We don't do anything different compared to any other bag of saltwater our size... :smile:

jaketodd said:
I bought an EMF meter that can discriminate to electric fields, and it is highly sensitive to the proximity of my body.
Go out into the middle of an open field and try it again. Most likely you will not see anything. If in your test you are in your house near AC Mains wiring, the AC voltage (current) from your parasitic capacitance to that wiring is probably what your EM meter is sensing.
 
Last edited:
Baluncore said:
Detecting muscle noise, EMG, is difficult.
ECG instruments are commonplace and not too high tech. They used to consist of nothing more than sensitive galvanometers, in the past. The electrical activity of the heart is measured by placing electrodes (pads) at a number of places on the torso. They record signals in the order of a few mV but that is very different from a radiated field. Is EMG a different thing, apart from the muscles it looks at?

The OP is referring to an EMF meter which, afaiaa, is for assessing the potential harm from exposure to EM fields. What he's been measuring / detecting will almost certainly be the effect of the presence of his body on the fields that are there anyway. An FM radio can be affected greatly by the presence of a human - either improving or worsening the signal strength, depending, in the same way as wiggling the whip antenna about. The body acts like a piece of metal of similar size and re-radiates signals in the vicinity.

Without knowing about the frequencies involved, it's hard to comment usefully on what he's seeing but there's not much chance of it coming from his body if a simple hand held device can register it.

PS EM Hazard assessment is a bit of a black art and getting relevant and meaningful readings of fields is pretty hard. Not least, the antenna / probe needs to be well calibrated and characterised if the results could be accepted in a court of law when someone claims Industrial Injury!
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Delta2
This thread has become a magnet for pseudoscience nonsense posts (which have been deleted). @jaketodd please do the "outstanding in your field" experiment that I suggested. Thank you. Thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top