I Do the Sachs-Wolfe and Rees-Sciama Effects Influence Matter?

AI Thread Summary
The Sachs-Wolfe and Rees-Sciama effects primarily influence cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons through gravitational potential changes in superclusters and supervoids. The integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect results in a net blueshift for photons passing through superclusters and a redshift for those crossing supervoids. Conversely, the Rees-Sciama effect alters the energy of photons, cooling them in dense regions while heating those near the edges of these structures. The discussion raises the question of whether these gravitational effects also impact massive particles, suggesting potential influences on the orbits of celestial bodies within clusters and voids. Understanding these dynamics could provide deeper insights into the relationship between gravity and matter in the universe.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Can the integrated Sachs-Wolfe and the Rees-Sciama effects have any influence on matter? For example influencing the orbits of celestial bodies in cluster & voids?
CMB photons can be affected by the expansion of the universe through the linear integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect (ISW) [1] and the non-linear ISW effect or also called Rees-Sciama effect [1].

In particular, according to the ISW effect, the photons crossing superclusters would leave them having a total net blueshift (because of the gravitational potential decay of the cluster) while crossing a supervoid would leave them with a total net redshift (all compared to the overall redshift from the universe's expansion itself)

The Rees-Sciama effect on the other hand, "cools" a bit the photons crossing both structures but "heats" them to those that travel near the outskirts of both superclusters and supervoids [2]


However, we are always talking about photons here. Do these effects also affect matter (or particles with mass) in any manner? For instance, since gravitational potentials are related to these effects, shouldn't that have some kind of influence for particles with mass as well (and not only masless particles, like photons)? Can these effects affect the orbits of celestial bodies in clusters and voids, for instance?



[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sachs–Wolfe_effect

[2]: https://www.roe.ac.uk/~cai/index_ISW.html
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?

Similar threads

Back
Top