Do we have Coriolis acceleration on the slider or is it purely centripetal?

AI Thread Summary
Coriolis acceleration occurs in a rotating reference frame and is distinct from centripetal acceleration, which is associated with circular motion in an inertial frame. The discussion highlights that Coriolis acceleration is relevant when analyzing motion from a rotating perspective, while centripetal acceleration applies to objects moving in a circular path. The confusion arises from the context of the frame of reference being considered; if the slider is analyzed in a rotating frame, Coriolis effects must be accounted for. Understanding the frame of reference is crucial in distinguishing between these two types of acceleration. Clarifying these concepts is essential for accurate analysis in physics.
firavia
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
according to the figure attached below , do we have a coriolis acceleration on the slider and why ?

why can't we say that it is a centripital acceleration ?

I want to know the difference between coriolis accelration and centrepetal acceleration ,

cause As I know , coriollis acceleration show's up only if we are studying the object in a rotational frame, why are we concidering here that it is a rotaitonal frame and not an inertial frame ??
 

Attachments

  • slider.JPG
    slider.JPG
    5.3 KB · Views: 431
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope someone would answer my question
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...
Back
Top