- #71
ghwellsjr
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,122
- 150
Of course there's a solution for any problem that's consistently and completely described but you have combined parameters that are inconsistent and left out other important details so that there is not a single interpretation of your scenario.Taragond said:maybe that's what I am trying to do...
If I had 2 synchronized clocks A&B and send B away with.9c for one year after which it decellerates and flies back. would the clocks still be synchronized? As I understand it, B would show less time has passed?
If that's correct, I would expect that in C time runs slower than in B, but from A's perspective in C time runs less slow than in B...so no...probably not...
But if it is a measurable effect with clocks there must be a solution to this?
I guess it would be too much to clarify here why speeds don't add algebraically? not sure, what to search for...
You could have said:
3 synchronized clocks, one stays at A while two are sent with B at .6c away from A.
After one year according to B's time, C gets with one of those clocks on B in a lifeboat and heads at .9c away from B relative to B in direction of A.
Then you could ask your questions like how fast is C traveling in A's rest frame and what time is on each clock in the different rest frames.