Maybe you have forgotten the P of PID.Sam Groves said:If we use a DI controller the error doesnt get better.
What do you mean?BvU said:Hi,
Can you please read your post and agree that telepathy is required to make sense of it ?
Do present us with a complete case instead of leaving us guessing ...
Thanks !
##\ ##
What are you trying to control ?Sam Groves said:What do you mean?
What do you meanBvU said:Hi,
Can you please read your post and agree that telepathy is required to make sense of it ?
Do present us with a complete case instead of leaving us guessing ...
Thanks !
##\ ##
A 1st order ot a 2nd order system.Baluncore said:What are you trying to control ?
This is like extracting teeth.Sam Groves said:A 1st order ot a 2nd order system.
Please provide more information. Currently no one has any idea what you're asking. Imagine we don't know what a DI controller is or what you're doing with it.Sam Groves said:If we use a DI controller the error doesnt get better.Regarding the error it is the same as we didnt have any controller at all.But does the DI controller improve the recovery time or not to not having any controller at all?
Yeah I agree I think PI controllers are the best.DaveE said:This is the sort of subject where if you can't ask a question that experts can understand, you won't understand the answer.
Having said that, my general advice is to ditch the "D" part ASAP. It will just confuse you, and it's likely you don't need it anyway.
A DI (Direct Injection) controller is an electronic device used in various systems, such as automotive engines and industrial processes, to manage and optimize the direct injection of fuel or other substances. It ensures precise control over the injection timing, quantity, and pressure, leading to improved efficiency, performance, and emissions control.
A DI controller improves system performance by providing precise control over the injection process. This precision allows for optimal combustion, which enhances power output, fuel efficiency, and reduces emissions. It also enables better response to changing conditions, such as load and speed, ensuring consistent performance.
Using a DI controller offers several benefits compared to having no controller. These benefits include improved fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, enhanced engine performance, better responsiveness, and the ability to fine-tune the system for different operating conditions. Without a controller, the system may suffer from inefficiencies, higher emissions, and reduced performance.
While a system without a DI controller can still function, it will likely be less efficient and have higher emissions compared to a system with a controller. The lack of precise control over the injection process can lead to suboptimal combustion, resulting in reduced performance and increased fuel consumption. In modern applications, especially in automotive engines, a DI controller is essential for meeting stringent efficiency and emissions standards.
One potential drawback of using a DI controller is the increased complexity and cost of the system. The controller itself, along with the necessary sensors and actuators, adds to the overall expense and requires more sophisticated maintenance. However, the benefits in terms of efficiency, performance, and emissions typically outweigh these drawbacks, making DI controllers a worthwhile investment in most applications.