Does a=-g Imply a*x^1=-g*x^2 in Lie 3-Algebras?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Digs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Digs
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi!

Im messing around with a Lie 3-Algebra at the moment(Im not sure how widespread these are. They obey similar rules to a Lie Algebra).

I have a bracket that looks like this:
[x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x1+g*x2+h*x3, with c,a,g,h, some structure constants.

I also have the relation a=-g.
Am I allowed to then say [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x2-g*x2+h*x3
or [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0=h*x3?

I suppose my question amounts to does a=-g also mean a*x^1=-g*x^2?

thanks so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Digs said:
Hi!

Im messing around with a Lie 3-Algebra at the moment(Im not sure how widespread these are. They obey similar rules to a Lie Algebra).

I have a bracket that looks like this:
[x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x1+g*x2+h*x3, with c,a,g,h, some structure constants.

I also have the relation a=-g.
Am I allowed to then say [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0+a*x2-g*x2+h*x3
Why would you ask? you have replaced x1 by x2 and g by -g. What right do you have to do that?

or [x1,x2,x3]=c*x0=h*x3?

I suppose my question amounts to does a=-g also mean a*x^1=-g*x^2?
No, of course not. Knowing that a=-g tells you nothing about ax1. Knowing that a= -g tells you that ax1= -gx1, not -gx2.

thanks so much
 
in hindsight that was a silly question
thanks for your help though
 
Bumping this for some more structure constant help.
I'm attempting to figure out what a particular Lie 3-algebra is by classifying it's structure constants, which are constrained by what's called the Fundamental Identity(Which is the 3-analog of the Jacobi Identity for normal Lie algebras).

I'm convinced I'm not doing something right as I've actually never computed an algebra this way before(I've only previously studied matrix lie algebras): could someone take a look at my equations?
I've unwound the identity into a system of equations that looks like

1. a=b
2. cd=ea
3. cf=eg
4.cb=eh
5. -g=j
6.ck=la
7.cm=lg
8.cj=lh
9.k=-f
10.ld=ek
11.lf=em
12.lb=ej

where {a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j,k,l,m} are all 4 indexed structure constants. I was proceeding before trying to divide by various things, but now I've realized that's probably not a legal move as these are indexed objects. Any advice would be wonderful!
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top