Does a net torque imply the presence of net force in a system?

AI Thread Summary
A net torque in a system implies the presence of a net force. Torque is a measure of rotational force, directly linked to the applied force and the distance from the axis of rotation. For net torque to occur, there must be an unbalanced force acting on the object, leading to rotation. Therefore, a net torque cannot exist without a corresponding net force. Understanding this relationship is crucial in analyzing rotational dynamics.
justagirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
if there is a net torque on a system does that mean there must be a net force on the system
 
Physics news on Phys.org
justagirl said:
if there is a net torque on a system does that mean there must be a net force on the system

No. Imagine a uniform rod with equal and opposite forces acting on it perpendicularly to each end.
 


Yes, there must be a net force on the system if there is a net torque. This is because torque is a measure of the rotational force acting on an object, and it is directly related to the force applied and the distance from the axis of rotation. In order for there to be a net torque, there must be an unbalanced force acting on the object, causing it to rotate. This means that there must also be a net force acting on the system, as torque and force are interconnected. In other words, a net torque cannot exist without a net force.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top