Does anyone know this equation? (fluid dynamics, Stokes law)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an equation related to Stokes law that corrects viscosity calculations for a sphere falling through a pipe, factoring in the pipe's diameter. The equation presented is mu_c = mu[1 - 2.104 d/D + 2.09 (d/D)^3 - 0.95 (d/D)^5], where mu_c is the corrected viscosity, d is the sphere's diameter, and D is the pipe's diameter. Participants are seeking the origin of this equation and its acceptance in the scientific community, with mentions of a possible derivation by Faxen. Additional resources are shared for further exploration of the equation's background and implications. The inquiry highlights the need for clarity on the equation's validity in fluid dynamics.
astro111
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was doing some research into my coursework (don't worry, this isn't a real 'help!' thread) on Stokes law, and I found this equation on this forum (posted in 2010), regarding the effect of the walls of a pipe on the calculated value for viscosity when a sphere is dropped through that pipe (sorry if that doesn't make sense!). The equation supposedly gives an approximate correction for that value of viscosity, taking into account the diameter of the pipe.
The equation is: mu_c = mu[1 - 2.104 d/D + 2.09 (d/D)^3 - 0.95 (d/D)^5]
where mu_c is the corrected viscosity, d is the diameter of the sphere and D the diameter of the pipe.

Does anyone know the origin of this equation, or whether it is accepted? I've been googling it for the past half an hour, but I'm yet to find anything! Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, however I was wondering if anyone knew where the equation originally came from (or whether it was simply devised by the website linked in that thread).

I've heard something about it being derived by someone called Faxen?
 
Without knowing anything about it, that equation looks very much like a Taylor series expansion of some odd function.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top