Does Fluid Near Solid Interfaces Move Faster Due to Viscosity Differences?

AI Thread Summary
Fluid dynamics near solid interfaces is governed by the boundary layer concept, where fluid velocity is zero at the solid surface and increases with distance from it. The no-slip boundary condition is fundamental, indicating that fluid in contact with a solid does not move relative to it. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these principles when simulating fluid behavior, particularly in computational models. Recommended literature includes "Viscous Fluid Flow" by Frank White and "Boundary Layer Theory" by Schlichting for deeper insights. Overall, the initial assumption about fluid speed near solid interfaces is incorrect, as it contradicts established fluid dynamics principles.
diegolas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

This is my first post and my background is in Computer Science, so pardon me if my terminology is not correct or even I sound ignorant Physics-wise :)

Anyways, I implemented a semi-Lagrangian based Navier-Stokes (NS) solver and it's running smoothly on a CUDA-capable GPU and I wondered if you guys can help me with something I noticed (maybe it's a law or maybe I'm just wrong).

Question: I got the impression from watching how fluids behave in real life (and for instance in the beach), and I think the fluid near the solid interface (e.g. sand for that matter) moves faster than the one on top? Is it true? Why is it? Intuitively I thought it may have to do with the delta in the viscosity (say, solid/sand - water interface), so the fluid "slips" more easily? If so, if I was to generalize the fact, is it true that the water near the solid moves faster than the one in "the middle" and near the air (maybe if we assume ideal conditions, no gravity, etc)?

Is there any law describing this? I mean, probably can be guessed from NSE but I was wondering if this has any fancy name.

Could you please recommend me literature so I can dig in more about this? I don't have access to ScienceDirect right now, and I'm not probably buying any book in the near future, so if it's not too much asking, I'd like to suggest you guys point me to papers available online?

Cheers,
Diego
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are talking about is the boundary layer, which is opposite to what you describe. A fluid at te solid surface does not move at all, actually. This is one of the fundamental boundary conditions for the NS equations so it leads me to wonder how you were solving it without that BC.

At any rate, fluid near a surface has zero velocity (with respect to the surface) and increases as you move away from the surface. There are tons of papers on it from around the turn of the century, but they are so old you may have trouble finding them. I know you seem averse to books, but I would suggest looking at "Viscous Fluid Flow" by Frank White. It has everything you Should need. If you want to dig even deeper, "Boundary Layer Theory" by Schlichting is the "sacred text" on the subject.
 
Thanks for the reply :)

Well, I didn't mention it but I was solving it with no-slip BC. But in any case, what I was trying to do is to inject external (arbitrary) forces so the fluid (water) behaves like real-life waves --maybe I have to look how water moves again.

Thanks for the bibliography, I'll try to get the books though I doubt the library has them xD
 
If it is a university library then I guarantee they have them.

At any rate, th no-slip condition is simply a mathematical translation of what I said. The fluid is motionless with respect to the wall it contacts. No external forces are needed because the boundary condition takes care of that for you.

For example, if you solve just the plain NS equations over a flat plate you get the Blasius solution, which precisely shows the boundary layer. It is one of the few analytical solutions that are possible, yet one of the most important.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top