Does it take two forces to deform an object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomR
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether two forces are needed to deform an object, particularly in the context of space junk impacts. It argues that a single force from the impacting object can cause deformation, with the second force being the reaction of the object being hit, represented by its mass and acceleration. The concept of inertia is highlighted, especially in high-speed impacts where the effects are localized. Space junk travels at significantly high velocities, leading to rapid impacts that primarily affect the immediate area. Overall, the conversation emphasizes that deformation can occur from a single force under specific conditions, particularly during high-rate processes.
tomR
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question - if 2 forces are required to deform an object then why does a piece of space junk impacting an object in space cause deformation? What is the second force?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Who says it takes two (external) forces to deform an object? Just look at a slow-motion video of bat hitting a ball.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Action and Reaction ?? :wink:
 
Ignoring the subtleties, inertia becomes dominant for high rate processes.
 
tomR said:
What is the second force?
Because ##F = ma##.
The first force is ##F##, the force applied by the impacting object.
The second force is ##ma##, or the mass of the object being hit multiplied by the acceleration of that object.

Frabjous said:
inertia becomes dominant for high rate processes.
Typical space junk is moving roughly ten times the velocity of a high velocity rifle bullet. That's a high rate process. The whole impact happens so fast that only the material in the immediate vicinity of the impact is affected. Space junk impact is finished punching a hole (or crater) before the material away from the impact is affected by the impact force.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK and Frabjous
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top