Does pressure affect the shape of water drops according to Gibb's phase rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Cool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between pressure and the shape of water drops, particularly in the context of Gibbs' phase rule. It highlights that the pressure inside a spherical water drop differs from the external pressure, raising questions about which pressure is relevant for Gibbs' phase rule. Surface tension is identified as a key factor, as it causes water molecules to attract each other more strongly than they do air molecules. This attraction results in a shape that minimizes surface area, counteracting the internal pressure that would otherwise deform the drop. Overall, surface tension plays a crucial role in maintaining the spherical shape of water drops despite pressure differences.
Joe Cool
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Hello,

after I read in an exercise that the pressure inside of a spherical water drop is different than the pressure outside, I'm a little bit confused. Which is the pressure used in Gibb's phase rule and why don't the pressure change the form of the water drop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Joe Cool said:
Hello,

after I read in an exercise that the pressure inside of a spherical water drop is different than the pressure outside, I'm a little bit confused. Which is the pressure used in Gibb's phase rule and why don't the pressure change the form of the water drop?
Are you familiar with the concept of surface tension?
 
Thanks for your hint. I read about the surface tension and understand it like this: The water molecules attract each other stronger than an air molecule. So there is a force that put the volume of the water in the form that has the minimal surface. This force can balance the deforming of the drop due to the greater pressure inside the drop.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top