Does Radiation from a Colder Body Affect a Hotter Body in a Vacuum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter philrainey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Radiation
AI Thread Summary
In a vacuum, both a hot body and a colder body radiate energy towards each other, but the hot body emits significantly more radiation than the cold body. While the colder body does radiate some energy towards the hotter body, it ultimately absorbs more energy from the hot body than it emits. This results in a net transfer of energy from the hot body to the cold body. The discussion highlights that despite both bodies radiating energy, the colder body can still experience a net loss of energy over time, as seen with planets in the solar system. Overall, the primary takeaway is that radiation occurs in both directions, but the hot body dominates the energy exchange.
philrainey
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
is it true that the radiation a colder body radiates through a vacuum will never hit a hotter body and have its radiation energy absorped? Is the radiation simply one way from the hot body to the colder body?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi philrainey! :smile:
philrainey said:
is it true that the radiation a colder body radiates through a vacuum will never hit a hotter body and have its radiation energy absorped? Is the radiation simply one way from the hot body to the colder body?

Nooo … they both absorb radiation from each other …

:biggrin: but the colder body always wins! :biggrin:
 
Remember that the hot emits more than the cold. So in the end there is still a net transfer from hot to cold, not from cold to hot.
 
The wording of the first sentence is very unclear to me...

Are you asking about two bodies sitting near each other in space? The hot object will radiate toward the cold one, but both will radiate away into space. Depending on the specifics of the situation, the cold one may still have a net loss of energy. Ie, the planets in the solar system have lost energy and cooled over billions of years despite getting energy from the sun. They radiate away more than they receive.
 
russ_watters said:
The wording of the first sentence is very unclear to me...

Are you asking about two bodies sitting near each other in space? The hot object will radiate toward the cold one, but both will radiate away into space. Depending on the specifics of the situation, the cold one may still have a net loss of energy. Ie, the planets in the solar system have lost energy and cooled over billions of years despite getting energy from the sun. They radiate away more than they receive.

From what I understand you are right that hot body radiates heat to the cold body and both radiate to outerspace but the cold body also radiates a little portion of heat to the hot body but not as much as the hot body to the cold one.
 
Oh, well yes, it can be said that the cold body radiates toward the hot body and just receives more in return, yes. The net effect is it is receiving.
 
Been around 40 years since I took basic physics in college and while I remember doing some examples of insulation values / energy conduction, I doubt I could to the math now even if I could find the formulas. I have some some corrugated plastic sheet (think of the plastic signs you see on the side of the road) that is used in bee hives. Also have some used in a green house though a bit different in dimensions than this example but the general approach should still apply. Typically, both...
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F. You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which...
Thread 'Is Callen right in claiming dQ=TdS for all quasi-static processes?'
Hello! I am currently reading the second edition of Callen's Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, and I have a question regarding Callen's definition of quasi-static. On page 96, Callen says: Another way of characterizing Callen's definition is that a process is quasi-static if it traces out a continuous curve in the system's configuration space. So far it's all well and good. A little later, Callen claims that the identification of $$TdS$$ as the heat transfer is only...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top