Does the Logarithm Correction Resolve the Gibbs Paradox?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Gibbs paradox and proposes that it can be resolved by applying the Gibbs correction to the logarithm of the partition function (Z) instead of Z itself. The suggested formula incorporates the number of identical particles in each class, allowing for a unified expression for various gas mixtures. This approach claims to generalize the treatment of different gases, identical gases with varying densities, and identical gases with the same density. However, a counterpoint is raised regarding the validity of summing the logarithms of each term in the partition function. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of the mathematical treatment of partition functions in statistical mechanics.
nucleartear
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What I have not seen in books about the Gibbs paradox is that it doesn't exist if we make the Gibbs correction at the logarithm of the Z function, not at the Z function itself, in that way:

\ln Z_{i} - \ln N_{i} !

where N_{i} is the number of identical particles of class i, where there are a total of p classes.

With this definition of the correction, we can generalize the three cases of gas mixture (diferent gases, identical gases with different density and identical gases with identical density) in one expresion!:

F = - k_{B} T \sum_{i=1}^{p} \Left( \ln Z_{i} - \ln N_{i} ! \Right)

You could say that it's the same but... I think it's not the same! :smile:

If you find some error, please, let me know!

Thanx!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nucleartear said:
F = - k_{B} T \sum_{i=1}^{p} \Left( \ln Z_{i} - \ln N_{i} ! \Right)

That's fine except that generally you can't simply sum over the logarithm of each term of the partition function.

Matt
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top