MHB Does the Subring Generated by Two UFDs Always Result in a UFD?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the subring generated by two unique factorization domains (UFDs) is itself a UFD. It is established that while both $\mathbb{Z}[X^2]$ and $\mathbb{Z}[X^3]$ are UFDs, their generated subring $\mathbb{Z}[X^2, X^3]$ is not a UFD. This is demonstrated by the existence of two distinct factorizations of $X^6$ within the subring. Consequently, the answer to the original question is negative; the subring generated by two UFDs does not necessarily result in a UFD. The findings highlight the complexities in the structure of subrings formed from UFDs.
Petek
Gold Member
Messages
405
Reaction score
37
Let $R$ be an integral domain. Suppose that $R_1$ and $R_2$ are proper subrings of $R$ and that both $R_1$ and $R_2$ are unique factorization domains (UFDs). Let $R_3$ be the subring of $R$ that is generated by $R_1$ and $R_2$. Is $R_3$ necessarily a UFD? (The subring generated by two subrings is defined to be the intersection of all subrings containing the two given subrings.)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

[sp]$\mathbb{Z}[X^2]$ and $\mathbb{Z}[X^3]$ are both UFDs. However, the subring they generate in $\mathbb{Z}[X]$, namely $\mathbb{Z}[X^2, X^3]$, is not a UFD because $X^6=X^2\cdot X^2\cdot X^2$ and $X^6=X^3 \cdot X^3$ are two distinct factorizations of $X^6$ into irreducible elements in $\mathbb{Z}[X^2, X^3]$.[/sp]
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top