Does Time Flow for a Photon in the Context of Time-Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kinny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
Kinny
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody]Since we see light, from the equation Δt=γ Δt' , Δt' (the Δtime in a photon) should be zero, cause γ→+∞ for v→c and Δt is a descrete number (if we actually see photons). So, I thought the time in a photon doesn't flow, but my Physic friend said it's wrong..? In the frequently asked question, it's written that the time "shrinks to zero", isn't that the same to say it doesn't flow in a photon?
Also, there's written that the distance shrinks to zero, but isn't suppose Δs'→+∞ ? Otherwise, for Δs=Δs' / γ , wouldn't we see the photons like "freeze", like not moving??
* γ = 1/ √(1-v^2 /c^2)
thanks for the answers...and sorry if I'm not approaching this in a very "elegant" way (i'm doing engineering XD
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're only quoting a very small portion of the FAQ and thus taking it out of context. Do you understand that when mathematicians speak of a limit, they mean something that you can approach to as closely as you want, but you're not allowed to actually get to? So the FAQ is saying that it's meaningless to talk about what happens when you get to the limit because you can't get there.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...

Similar threads

Back
Top