Double major: Astronautics & Astronomypossible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samsung90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double major Major
AI Thread Summary
Double majoring in Astronautics and Astronomy is challenging due to the distinct nature of the fields, with Astronautics being an engineering discipline and Astronomy a natural science. While there may be some shared foundational courses in math and physics, the specific major coursework diverges significantly after the initial stages. Some universities may have overlapping course numbers, but this does not translate to substantial overlap in curriculum requirements. The consensus suggests that pursuing one degree first and then the other may be a more feasible approach. Ultimately, the lack of overlap in advanced coursework makes simultaneous completion of both degrees unlikely.
samsung90
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Double major: Astronautics & Astronomy..possible??

From the little research I've done, I've gathered that to double major at any university, there must be great overlap in the topics studied/researched (phd) associated with the degrees.

I am curious as to how accurate this is and also as to how much overlap Astronautics has with Astronomy.

Since Astronautics is a "space-focused" form of aerospace engineering and Astronomy is the application of physical laws to explain cosmic phenomena, it seems to me there would be extensive overlap and therefore potential for a combined or double major/degree.

( I am referring to the double major in which both degrees are acquired simultaneously; I am not referring to finishing one and returning to finish a second)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There is absolutely no overlap between the two fields. One is an engineering field and one is a natural science.
 


Hi samsung90, even i wanted to do the same thing..Aerospace engineering and Cosmology..As Pengwuino Said its true One is an engineering field and one is a natural science.
but you have a option like if possible 1st complete Astronautics and then after that when u find job some where do it parallely...
 


@ pegwuino: At first i rationalized the same thing as I've long known the distinctness between the two. However in my area, the university i am most likely going to has a lot of the same math and physics courses for each degree, right down to the course number; this is actually what prompted me to start the thread.

thanks tho,
samysung
 


samsung90 said:
@ pegwuino: At first i rationalized the same thing as I've long known the distinctness between the two. However in my area, the university i am most likely going to has a lot of the same math and physics courses for each degree, right down to the course number; this is actually what prompted me to start the thread.

thanks tho,
samysung

Almost all engineering majors inevitably share a few course requirements with Astronomy simply because they're science/engineering fields. They're the same requirements that an electrical engineer or mechanical engineer or maybe even a chemistry major would have to take, but none of those have any overlap with astronomy.
 


samsung90 said:
@ pegwuino: At first i rationalized the same thing as I've long known the distinctness between the two. However in my area, the university i am most likely going to has a lot of the same math and physics courses for each degree, right down to the course number; this is actually what prompted me to start the thread.

thanks tho,
samysung
While true, that will barely get you into your second year. From there on, there will be no overlap in required major coursework.
 
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top