Double Slit Interference (nonzero slit width)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between adjacent bright fringes in a double slit interference pattern, given specific parameters such as slit width and separation. The participant initially struggles with using the correct formulas for intensity and electric field, ultimately realizing the need to treat the problem as a superposition of two diffraction patterns. Clarifications are made regarding the relationships between variables φ and β, with emphasis on their roles in determining bright fringes. It is noted that near the central axis, the sin(β/2) term can be approximated as 1, simplifying calculations. The conversation concludes with an affirmation that the oscillation of the cos(φ/2) term significantly influences the overall intensity pattern.
TOD
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mask with 2 slits is illuminated by a light of 589nm wavelength. Slits each have a 0.1mm width separated (centre to centre) by 3.0mm. Calculate the distance between adjacent bright fringes on the screen if a screen is placed 5.0m away from the slits.


Homework Equations


Where

\beta=2\pidsin\theta/\lambda

\phi=2\piasin\theta/\lambda

d=slit separation
a=slit width

E=E(max)cos\frac{\phi}{2}*(\frac{sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2})

(sorry, no good with this latex stuff, some stuff not showing right)

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I assume that if given a slit width of some size then we cannot assume that the interference comes from points sources. So to calculate the distance between adjacent bright fringes, I took on the formula for intensity and turned it into electric field of some form (just square rooted) and tried to differentiate the electric field and then find the roots of the equation. However I have found this extremely lengthy and most probably unnecessary. Can anyone get me started in the correct direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Treat the problem as the superposition of two diffraction patterns, one from each 0.1 mm slit. Where a bright fringe from one source occupies the same position as the other source's bright fringe this is a bright fringe of the double slit system.
 
TOD said:

Homework Equations


Where

\beta=2\pidsin\theta/\lambda

\phi=2\piasin\theta/\lambda
Looks like you have φ and β switched around here, given your expression for E below.

d=slit separation
a=slit width

E=E(max)cos\frac{\phi}{2}*(\frac{sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2})

Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Looks like you have φ and β switched around here, given your expression for E below.

Ah yes, my bad.


Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?

Plus or minus one? So I could in theory get that thing to equal 1, but that doesn't mean the product of this and the sine of a sine function is maximum does it?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?


TOD said:
Plus or minus one?
Yes, exactly.

TOD said:
So I could in theory get that thing to equal 1, but that doesn't mean the product of this and the sine of a sine function is maximum does it?
That's a good question. The answer, in practice, is yes it does. Since measurements of fringe spacing are typically done near the central axis, where
sin(β/2) / (β/2) ≈ 1,​
the effect of the sin(β/2) term can be ignored.

Or put another way, the cos(φ/2) term oscillates many many times for each oscillation of the sin(β/2) term. This is because d and φ are much larger than a and β, respectively. (In the present case they are 30 times larger.)

Hope that helps.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Yes, exactly.


That's a good question. The answer, in practice, is yes it does. Since measurements of fringe spacing are typically done near the central axis, where
sin(β/2) / (β/2) ≈ 1,​
the effect of the sin(β/2) term can be ignored.

Or put another way, the cos(φ/2) term oscillates many many times for each oscillation of the sin(β/2) term. This is because d and φ are much larger than a and β, respectively. (In the present case they are 30 times larger.)

Hope that helps.

Very interesting. Thanks for the help.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top