Eddington Finkelstein coordinates in the Schwarzschild spacetime

vitaniarain
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Do the Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates allow to cover the maximal analytic extension of the Schwarzschild spacetime? ans if not what region do they cover?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They cover the entire manifold except for the "true" singularity at r=0.
 
vitaniarain said:
Do the Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates allow to cover the maximal analytic extension of the Schwarzschild spacetime? ans if not what region do they cover?

Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates cover only half of the maximal analytic extension of Schwarzschild spacetime. Take a look at section 5.1.3 in Eric Poisson's notes,

http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/poisson/research/agr.pdf.

Better yet, see if your library has a copy of the excellent book, A Relativist's Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black Hole Mechanics, into which the notes evolved.

Ingoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates cover half of the maximal analytic extension of the Schwarzschild spacetime, and outgoing Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates cover half of the maximal analytic extension of the Schwarzschild spacetime. Note that:

1) these are two different coordinate systems;

2) they cover different, but overlapping, halves of spacetime;

3) If "Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates" appears without either "ingoing" or "outgoing", than "ingoing" is usually meant;

4) Poisson labels the regions of spacetime differently than does Wald.
 
Last edited:
Sorry about my above answer, I think I am in error.
 
Thank you for your answers and help!
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top