MHB Effie's question via email about Complex Numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the argument of the complex number \( z^5 \) where \( z = -2 + 2i \). The polar form of \( z \) is determined to be \( 2\sqrt{2} e^{\frac{3\pi}{4} i} \), leading to \( z^5 = 128\sqrt{2} e^{\frac{15\pi}{4} i} \). The angle \( \frac{15\pi}{4} \) is adjusted to fit within the defined range of \( (-\pi, \pi] \), resulting in \( \text{arg}(z^5) = -\frac{\pi}{4} \). The solution confirms the correct calculation of the argument based on the properties of complex numbers.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
If $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z = -2 + 2\,\mathbf{i} \end{align*}$ what is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( z^5 \right) \end{align*}$?

First let's write this number in its polar form.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| z \right| &= \sqrt{\left( -2 \right) ^2 + 2^2} \\ &= \sqrt{4 + 4} \\ &= \sqrt{8} \\ &= 2\,\sqrt{2} \end{align*}$

and as the number is in Quadrant 2

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( z \right) &= \pi - \arctan{ \left| \frac{2}{-2} \right| } \\ &= \pi - \arctan{ \left( 1 \right) } \\ &= \pi - \frac{\pi}{4} \\ &= \frac{3\,\pi}{4} \end{align*}$

thus we can say

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} z &= -2 + 2\,\mathrm{i} \\ &= 2\,\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{ \frac{3\,\pi}{4}\,\mathrm{i} } \\ z^5 &= \left( 2\,\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{3\,\pi}{4}\,\mathrm{i}} \right) ^5 \\ &= 128\,\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{ \frac{15\,\pi}{4}\,\mathrm{i} } \end{align*}$

so that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^5 \end{align*}$ makes an angle of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{15\,\pi}{4} \end{align*}$ with the positive real axis, but as we define $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( Z \right) \in \left( -\pi , \pi \right] \end{align*}$, that means we keep adding or subtracting integer multiples of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2\,\pi \end{align*}$ until we have an angle in this region.

Thus $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( z^5 \right) = -\frac{\pi}{4} \end{align*}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Prove It said:
First let's write this number in its polar form.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| z \right| &= \sqrt{\left( -2 \right) ^2 + 2^2} \\ &= \sqrt{4 + 4} \\ &= \sqrt{8} \\ &= 2\,\sqrt{2} \end{align*}$

and as the number is in Quadrant 2

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( z \right) &= \pi - \arctan{ \left| \frac{2}{-2} \right| } \\ &= \pi - \arctan{ \left( 1 \right) } \\ &= \pi - \frac{\pi}{4} \\ &= \frac{3\,\pi}{4} \end{align*}$

thus we can say

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} z &= -2 + 2\,\mathrm{i} \\ &= 2\,\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{ \frac{3\,\pi}{4}\,\mathrm{i} } \\ z^5 &= \left( 2\,\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{\frac{3\,\pi}{4}\,\mathrm{i}} \right) ^5 \\ &= 128\,\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{e}^{ \frac{15\,\pi}{4}\,\mathrm{i} } \end{align*}$

so that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} z^5 \end{align*}$ makes an angle of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{15\,\pi}{4} \end{align*}$ with the positive real axis, but as we define $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( Z \right) \in \left( -\pi , \pi \right] \end{align*}$, that means we keep adding or subtracting integer multiples of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2\,\pi \end{align*}$ until we have an angle in this region.

Thus $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \textrm{arg}\,\left( z^5 \right) = -\frac{\pi}{4} \end{align*}$.
This problem is solved correctly.
 
Well, we can see that ##\arg (z) = \frac{3\pi}{4}## by considering its position in the plane. Then ##arg (z^5) = \frac{15\pi}{4} = -\frac {\pi}{4}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Back
Top