Einstein solid state model exercise

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the Einstein solid state model using the canonical ensemble approach to find the partition function. A participant expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and seeks guidance on verification methods. Another contributor points out the need to clarify the addition of terms in the partition sum, emphasizing that the two sums over n_r and n_l should factorize. This highlights the importance of correctly applying the principles of statistical mechanics in the context of the problem. The conversation underscores the need for clear understanding of partition functions in equilibrium systems.
besebenomo
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The system is composed of a set of N non-interacting harmonic oscillators which can be described as a two-dimensional Einstein solid model in the x, y plane. Suppose that each oscillator has mass m and charge q and that there is a magnetic field HH directed along the z direction.
Relevant Equations
Compute (when the system at thermal equilibrium at temperature T):
Internal Energy
Magnetization
Specific heat capacity\bigm
ass_1.png


I tried to solve it considering the canonical ensemble (since the system is at the equilibrium with temperature T) and started finding the partition function:
CodeCogsEqn(3).png
The problem is I am not sure if I have done it correctly and need help because I don't really know where to check.
 

Attachments

  • CodeCogsEqn(2).png
    CodeCogsEqn(2).png
    3.1 KB · Views: 143
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you adding the two terms in your expression for the partition sum? You just have to use the expression and do the two sums over ##n_r## and ##n_l##. Obviously these two sums factorize!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top