Elastic Collision Problem - pretty sure my answer isn't right.

AI Thread Summary
In the elastic collision problem, Walt collides with Wolfie, resulting in a final speed for Wolfie that the poster initially calculates as 4.17 m/s. This value raises concerns since it exceeds Walt's initial speed of 3.7 m/s, which seems counterintuitive. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the masses of the bumper cars in the kinetic energy calculations, as they contribute to the overall system's energy conservation. It is noted that while Wolfie is less massive than Walt, he could still achieve a higher speed post-collision due to the principles of energy conservation. The conversation highlights the need to reassess the calculations to ensure they align with the laws of physics governing elastic collisions.
gh_pluvilias
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Walt and Wolfie collide in bumper cars of mass 50 kg each. Walt has a mass of 78 kg, and Wolfie has a mass of 61 kg. Walt strikes Wolfie from the rear at V = 3.7 m/s. If the collision is elastic, Wolfie is initially at rest, and Walt's final speed is 0.2655 m/s in the same direction, what is Wolfie's speed after the collision?


Homework Equations


m1*(u1^2)/2 = m1*(v1^2)/2 + m2*(v2^2)/2


The Attempt at a Solution


78*(3.7^2)/2 = 78*(0.2655^2)/2 + 61*(x^2)/2
and I get 4.17 m/s, but that doesn't seem right to me.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why doesn't 4.17 m/s sound reasonable to you?
 
Then Wolfie's speed after the collision is higher than the velocity that Walt hit Wolfie with initially, which doesn't seem right.
 
What happened to the mass of the bumper cars themselves?
 
Along SteamKing's lines, remember that the bumper cars are part of the kinetic energies we're talking about. With that said, Wolfie is less massive that Walt, so might it be conceivable that he's going faster than Walt was? We're talking about energy conservation, not velocity conservation.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top