Elastic Collisions and Harmonic Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motion of a ball dropped from a height of 10 meters and its behavior upon an elastic collision with a hard surface. Despite initial assumptions that the motion would be simple harmonic due to the elastic nature of the collision, the correct answer is identified as periodic motion with a period of about 2.8 seconds, but not simple harmonic. The key points emphasize that the acceleration during the ball's descent is constant, while the acceleration changes upon bouncing, thus disqualifying it from being classified as harmonic motion. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and characteristics of harmonic motion versus periodic motion. Ultimately, the ball's motion is periodic due to energy conservation, but does not meet the criteria for simple harmonic motion.
Knissp
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball is dropped from a height of 10 meters onto a hard surface so that the collision at the surface may be assumed elastic. Under such conditions the motion of the ball is
(A) simple harmonic with a period of about 1.4 s
(B) simple harmonic with a period of about 2.8 s
(C) simple harmonic with an amplitude of 5 m
(D) periodic with a period of about 2.8 s but not simple harmonic
(E) motion with constant momentum


The Attempt at a Solution



I would assume that since its an elastic collision, that it would engage in simple harmonic motion, but the answer is D so evidently that is not the case. Anyone care to explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must have a definition of Harmonic motion somewhere in you textbook.It really isn't hard to find out if that definition does apply.
 
the acceleration is not directly proportional to the displacement but a constant acceleration (assume there is no air resistance)
there is no equilibrium position between the extreme ends... (as well as force= 0)
and the direction is downward besides at the pt where the ball rebounces...
it is periodic motion, since the collision is elastic .i.e. energy(KE) is conserved.
by s=ut+1/2at^2
s=5t^2
t = sqrt 2=1.41 , representing the time for "half motion"
T=1.41*2=2.82 s
 
mysqlpress said:
the acceleration is not directly proportional to the displacement but a constant acceleration

so it isn't harmonic motion. The acceleration isn't constant when the ball bounces
of course. If "movement with constant acceleration" was a question, I'd have to
answer no.
 
kamerling said:
so it isn't harmonic motion. The acceleration isn't constant when the ball bounces
of course. If "movement with constant acceleration" was a question, I'd have to
answer no.

Indeed, these three factors are just provided you as explanations :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top