Electric Field and Acceleration for a Single Charged Plate and Capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field and acceleration for a charged plate and capacitor. The electric field (E) is derived from the formula E = Q / [Eo * (0.020 m)^2], while the acceleration (a) is calculated using a = E (1.60*10^-19 C)/(1.67*10^-27 kg), resulting in a value of 2.0 * 10^12 m/s^2. The problem hints at a constant electric field, suggesting it may be related to a charged square plate or a planar capacitor. It is clarified that the trajectory of the charged particle does not need to be parallel to E, but its acceleration must be. The particle in question is identified as a proton based on its mass and charge.
Zbud
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I don't have any statement, i have to find the problem statement from the answers
a) E = Q / [ Eo* (0.020 m)^2 ]
b) a = E (1.60*10-19 C)/(1.67*10^-27 kg) = 2.0 *10^12 m/s^2
R=0,020 m
q=1.60*10-19 C
m=1.67*10^-27 kg

Homework Equations


F=ma => a=qE/m
Gauss Law Integral of (E,ds)=Q/Eo

The Attempt at a Solution


So given E constant everywhere i can assume that E*(integral of ds)=Q/Eo, so if this was a sphere it would be
4piR^2*E=Q/Eo so its out, my equation must be something like E*R^2=Q/Eo , so my area should be a a square ?,
also E and the trajectory of my q must be parallel right ?
Any helpful hints are really appreciated ;d
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zbud said:

Homework Statement


I don't have any statement, i have to find the problem statement from the answers
a) E = Q / [ Eo* (0.020 m)^2 ]
b) a = E (1.60*10-19 C)/(1.67*10^-27 kg) = 2.0 *10^12 m/s^2
R=0,020 m
q=1.60*10-19 C
m=1.67*10^-27 kg

Homework Equations


F=ma => a=qE/m
Gauss Law Integral of (E,ds)=Q/Eo

The Attempt at a Solution


So given E constant everywhere i can assume that E*(integral of ds)=Q/Eo, so if this was a sphere it would be
4piR^2*E=Q/Eo so its out, my equation must be something like E*R^2=Q/Eo , so my area should be a a square ?,
also E and the trajectory of my q must be parallel right ?
Any helpful hints are really appreciated ;d

The Attempt at a Solution


So given E constant everywhere i can assume that E*(integral of ds)=Q/Eo, so if this was a sphere it would be
4piR^2*E=Q/Eo so its out, my equation must be something like E*R^2=Q/Eo , so my area should be a a square ?,
also E and the trajectory of my q must be parallel right ?
Any helpful hints are really appreciated ;d[/QUOTE]
You guess well, it might be the constant electric field of a a charged square-shaped plate, or rather the electric field between the plates of a planar capacitor with charge Q, where the plates of the capacitor are squares of sides 0.02 m.
The trajectory of the particle with charge q need not be parallel to E, but its acceleration has to be. What do you think the particle is?
 
  • Like
Likes Zbud
Given its mass and charge it must be certainly a proton, i have been thinking about the capacitor but truly as we have not talked about it once during the lectures so I wasnt keen on that idea,I'm grateful for your insight into this unusual problem
 
Zbud said:
Given its mass and charge it must be certainly a proton, i have been thinking about the capacitor but truly as we have not talked about it once during the lectures so I wasnt keen on that idea,I'm grateful for your insight into this unusual problem
That is correct, it must be a proton. Well done!
In case of single charged plate, the electric field is Q/(2Aε0), but it is Q/(Aε0) in case of a capacitor.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top